Sunday, June 14, 2009

Instructional Methods - Construvist vs. Behaviorist

I reviewed Learning Theories on two different web sites, one Judith V. Boettcher, Ph. D., is the Executive Director of the Corporation for Research and Educational Networking (CREN),and the other from the University of Washington. Information from these two sites brought me to this conclusion: the behaviorist model versus the constructivist model shows the constructivist model is far superior in aiding student learning and application of principles.

The constructivist theory is based on building on student’s prior learning and experience. Students are encouraged to work collaboratively with the instructor as a mentor and guide. Students create their own learning experience guided by the instructor building on known principles and applying learning to real situations. If I were making a lesson plan for an English Composition class for instance, a constructivist approach to learning would be giving the students a YouTube video to watch, “A Vision of Students Today,” then have them write explaining in detail the effects of technology on college students both in school and in their personal lives. This assignment challenges students to be analytical and extrapolate information from the video stretching them to think critically and write down their conclusions. If posted to a blog or discussion board or discussed in a class, this can stimulate further discussion with classmates who will have other opinions to add to the analytical process.

The behaviorist method focuses on instructors presenting material to students who are then expected to memorize and prove acquisition of knowledge through tests as assessment measures. This model does not challenge students to analyze information while making connections to reality based situations. An example of an assignment using the behaviorist model would be giving students Vocabulary works to define and giving them a quiz to assess proficiency. This lesson doesn’t require students to do anything but memorize and regurgitate information.

Student will also respond to the constructivist method more readily as it is more interactive and gives students the opportunity to work collaboratively benefiting from classmate’s knowledge. In my opinion, the constructivist model is far superior for meeting learning outcomes that will benefit the student in the world of work.

1 comment:

  1. I agree in theory (hahaha).. but there must be a happy medium. There is value in repetition; learning a song by playing it over and over, for example.

    ReplyDelete